Thanks be to Bey

Hey Blogger, it has been a while, I've been making changes!

Today there is something pretty heavy on my mind. The institution of "The National Church of Bey".
From what I have read this is a church erected in the Name of Beyoncé Knowles, she has been recognized as a diety by some of her fans and followers and as such they have erected a temple in her honor. In addition to weekly services where the Diva's songs are sung and then analyzed, the Beyists intend to soon distribute the Beyble to the masses. As I type this I can't help but laugh, it feels so falsified, and unbelievable.

I was looking at the Tumblr page of Beyism, where the religion's leaders post about their beliefs and plead with society to accept and respect them as a legitimate organization just like any other religious group.

I want to approach this from a few angles.

1st: Where is Beyoncé?
I have searched the internet high and low for a response from the singer and I have come up with nothing. I would think that all religion aside Beyoncé would have something to say about people worshiping her. She would have something to say about the Beyble and her newly erected temple. I don't want to get into the religious debate about Beyoncé's practiced, frankly it is none of my business! (Sips tea)

However, as an avid DC3 fan I cannot help but recall the trio's chanson of the gospel medley in which they all thanked the lord, sang hallelujah, and proclaimed the goodness of the Lord over and over again. Which perhaps mislead me to believe that somewhere under all of her "flawlessness" lay a Christ loving heart.
As I have mentioned I could be wrong.
But lets just say I'm not wrong, wouldn't then Beyoncé be compelled top tell her worshipers that Idolatry and graven images are not of Christ and also just as quick to denounce any relation or condolence of their behavior?
I could be wrong though.

2nd: I am now and I have always been an advocate for religious freedom. While I choose to worship Christ another may choose to worship Bey. But we need to ask ourselves as a human race, what is to come next. The way I see it Beyoncé is the first of many. There are certainly Elvis fans who proclaim his deity, and surely MJ and Whitney have followers who would gladly erect a temple in their name. (honestly I think Whitney's music is more holistic and message worthy than Bey's "bow down bitches" but that just me). All I'm saying is trending topics tend to set trends.

3rd: This is personal, as I mentioned before I am driven by Christ in all that I do. My aim is to magnify and glorify his name because he is the only reason I live. he died so that I could live. Beyoncé did not die for my sins, she did not rise from the grave and she will not save me from the hell that is earth. She is a person, born of two people. She is not now nor will she ever be a God. I am not so much offended as I am astounded by the lack of forethought that people put into founding religions. considering the premise of the religion and their practices it seems almost criminal to associate such practices with a word that implies seeking higher power and deeper meaning. Anyone with eyes can see that she's been blessed however we also know that what he gives us he can also take away.

4th: On the Tumblr (linked here) there is a post of three girls talking about their experience with their religion as it related to Beyism. The comment written by the Tumblr author states that the girls are "hypocritical Christians". I really want to dig deep into this because the first post on the page is about people respecting their beliefs and not being accepting of their newly found faith. can a Beyist be a hypocritical Beyist? By backbiting at these young Christians I would certainly say so....unless Beyism is all about throwing shade in which case they are simply following the doctrine. Does Bey have commandments? I digress.

It's weird and somewhat stalkerish to form a religion around another human being, and it is even stranger that this human being in all of her mega star glory does not feel the need to speak out for or against it.

Now I know this blog is supposed to be about activism, and believe me I have every intention to continue change making in the best way I know possible. This is a topic that really just has me all around puzzled.

In other more important news there is mass genocide happening in Israel. but no one is tweeting, booking, spacing, gramming or otherwise talking about that...Thanks be to Bey

#Hashtag

I read a disheartening article this week. A soldier patronizing the hashtag and challenging "the vanity of  hashtag activism". Immediately I thought about how important it is to mobilize our efforts as we are able. I wondered what he hoped to accomplish with his smear campaign against social media activism. And I couldn't help but throw my two cents back at him so here it is!


http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/139946-time-army-ranger-tweets-perfect-bringbackourgirls-response/

#"Hashtags will not bring our girls back "...but neither will silence. "Speaking Out", whether through social media or a press conference is just that; speaking out. Anti-bullying ads don't stop bullies and Pro-life/choice ads don't stop or encourage abortions. The difference between an Anti-Bullying or Pro-life/choice ad and the bring back our girls hashtag is the fact that these causes, these initiatives are ADVERTISED by big media corporations. They are funded and broadcasted to mass audiences with the hopes of persuading and convincing the masses that this particular cause is worthwhile.

The abduction of "our girls" has not been advertised, there are no bring back our girls commercials, there are no "real men don't buy girls" PSA's or billboards. As such it is not unreasonable for people to not only express themselves publicly, but also to create a community of people who care about a cause. That is what hashtags do.
#"Highly trained Operators will [bring back our girls]" People are not so naïve to believe that a pound sign will find and bring back anyone. Its insulting to insinuate otherwise. What a hashtag can do is serve as motivation, instead of insulting the people who are supporting the cause for which the highly trained operators are risking their lives, why not take time to appreciate that a generational staple i.e. the hashtag is being used as support. No one whines about "support our troops" hashtags even though they are simple words and do not actually provide any physical support for the troops, so why is this any different?

#"Stop lazy internet activism"...Activism is anything but lazy, action is literally the root of activism. The promotion of a cause via social media is not only effective in raising awareness but also essential to winning a social war. If "internet activism is "lazy" then by definition activism itself is lazy, as it does not require the physical accomplishment of a task, more so the support, rallying, and promotion of a cause. So often the hashtag is used to promote the popularity of ignorance and negativity, or even "news" that isn't significant to our well-being as a nation, as a planet, or as a human race; it is refreshing to me, and I am sure I am not alone, to see people actively engaged in conversation about issues that matter.
#"You are not making a difference"....This is a largely presumptuous statement.  Who is he, or anyone else to say that someone's hashtag does not make a difference? I will venture to assume that this "highly trained operator" hasn't completely considered all aspects of the situation. What I mean to say is, if we look at the issue of the abducted Nigerian girls from the perspective of their Nigerian parents, we come to the realization that our disdain for the circumstance as is, is really irrelevant. However, the internet has the ability to accomplish so much! From  overseas and across borders we can reach out to all people, and let them know that we are abhorred by the acts committed against them and their families! Supportive words go a long way! That is a difference!
I am curious to know if this is transferrable to all situations, consider the children that are kidnapped in the US; do police officers feel that hashtags or statuses that promote awareness of child abductions are examples of "lazy internet activism"? Granted none of the people who post or share pictures of missing children will be the actual people endangering their own lives to recue them, however spreading the word via social network has been proven highly effective. Why should anyone be condemned for extending kind words of support towards a population in need.

If anything the "bring back our girls" movement is directly in line with the "warrior" that is going to be working to make it happen. I feel that this soldier's disdain for the hashtag stems from the lack of action behind it, however bringing about social awareness to issues is very important in problem solving.  The statement "the vanity of hashtag activism" assumes that the people promoting awareness have a delusive point of view that their hashtags are actually affecting change, when in fact there is no evidence of such a belief. promoting awareness and affecting change go hand in hand in hand, but they are not the same thing!

Now, I need to clarify something! I am not arguing that "internet activism" is sufficient to make change. In fact I will adamantly argue the opposite. Additionally, I have nothing but the utmost respect for the men and women who place themselves in the line of fire to actually accomplish the dreams of American's including bringing our girls back.

It's all about perspective!

“Dream delivers us to dream, and there is no end to illusion. Life is like a train of moods like
a string of beads, and, as we pass through them, they prove to be many-colored lenses which
paint the world their own hue. . . . ”
― Ralph Waldo Emerson

See the original article here:
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/139946-time-army-ranger-tweets-perfect-bringbackourgirls-response/